Batch to EXEcute

ebrizzlez · Post by **ebrizzlez** » 27 Nov 2008, 16:59

I dont know, but I've been daunting on this idea to make a program that can compile batch commands into an executable. This idea was given by the idea when you google up "programming" you are likely to get a million pages with the results of "batch programming"

Anyways, I used the LCC portable compiler to compile the batch commands into an executable and used upx to pack the executable so the file size overall is reduced.

For those who really like to mess around in batch and instead of distributing a .bat file all the time, why don't you try this program for a bit. Most batchers seem to not like to distribute the .bat format because they feel insecure that some other batcher make take their code. Idk, I got bored and made this program. Its only on version v0.1

Btw, Kriegze is another handle I have. As well as X0rBiSoNe... Dont ask. Krieg originates from the word Blitzkrieg and Krieg means 'war'. "War"+"Ze" You do the math. ;]

Please, if you like it, I'll release another version with improvements, Just give me a comment.

Code: Select all

http://www.sendspace.com/file/inpqre

If you like it, add it to the downloads section. Idk, idc. Do what you want with it. ^^

Btw, the executables b2d.exe and chk.exe was packed with telock, I am not sure if some AV's pick up the packer or not. If it does, its a false postive. chk.exe is only provided to make sure noone tampers with my files and verifies a proper release.

happy thanks giving and enjoy to all.

rhysh · Post by **rhysh** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:03

with a bit or reverse engineering im pretty sure i could reverse ur chk.exe ,but i wont do that unless i get bored,just a challenge i guess,thanks i will test this ebriz

ebrizzlez · Post by **ebrizzlez** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:09

There's not much security in the chk.exe , so I bet you could.

It uses a weak check system, just checks if the file exist and if the file is the correct size. As long as the file exist and is the correct size, than it flags as a successful program. Next time I'll implement a md5 hash or something to improve security.

rhysh · Post by **rhysh** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:14

lol did you know that the first ap i cracked took a few minutes,less than 5,and it was winrar,bt yet winrar should be harder, i mean its only one of the most popular apps right?

lol like wtf

ebrizzlez · Post by **ebrizzlez** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:18

Some protection schemes are quiet useless. Such as my protection method, if you get a telock unpacker, than you could reverse the file. You could modify the files but as long as the file is the correct size than the protection method is rendered useless.

rhysh · Post by **rhysh** » 27 Nov 2008, 17:20

yeah lol, i tried a telock unpacker but it didnt work,what version of telock did you use

ebrizzlez · Post by **ebrizzlez** » 27 Nov 2008, 18:40

Now that will defeat the purpose of packing it.

In reversing best bet is to use an analysis program, I recommend PEid.

I'll distribute the source in the next build if the program is successful.