Hash thread
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
Re: Hash thread
aaaaaand had to start again....
obviously there is a bug in the latest rcracki version (0.70) which makes it impossible to resume sessions...when trying to resume it simply starts again from the beginning.
version 0.6.6 works fine though, more soon...I hope...
obviously there is a bug in the latest rcracki version (0.70) which makes it impossible to resume sessions...when trying to resume it simply starts again from the beginning.
version 0.6.6 works fine though, more soon...I hope...
Re: Hash thread
lol, that sucks >_<bad_brain wrote:aaaaaand had to start again....
obviously there is a bug in the latest rcracki version (0.70) which makes it impossible to resume sessions...when trying to resume it simply starts again from the beginning.
version 0.6.6 works fine though, more soon...I hope...
Don't put too much time on it ^^
I'll just have mine running on it for a bit longer.
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
Re: Hash thread
no luck so far:
for the other sets the first block always took about 60-180 sec., while this one:
running the biggest set now, which I saved for last because the initial cryptanalysis takes an aweful long time for some odd reason.statistics
-------------------------------------------------------
plaintext found: 0 of 4 (0.00%)
total disk access time: 22708.07 s
total cryptanalysis time: 3594.58 s
total pre-calculation time: 7749.12 s
total chain walk step: 18446744064986474960
total false alarm: 1476686
total chain walk step due to false alarm: 27077461076
for the other sets the first block always took about 60-180 sec., while this one:
might be because it's a perfect table (loweralpha numeric 1-10) with a size of more than 800GB already. will let you know when it's done...cryptanalysis time: 25919.53 s
Re: Hash thread
Awesome!
Same here though, no luck.
Well, I have most of the hashes cracked, but these are administrative ones.
So if we can't crack these then I'll see what access the other accounts have, and go from there.
Same here though, no luck.
Well, I have most of the hashes cracked, but these are administrative ones.
So if we can't crack these then I'll see what access the other accounts have, and go from there.
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
Re: Hash thread
The second hash in the list cracked, of the ones I sent you b_b
It was "atlasdiesel" xF
It was "atlasdiesel" xF
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
Re: Hash thread
oh, great! explains why it wasn't cracked by me yet, the tables I have ran so far are 1-10...still haven't run the last huge sets of alphanumeric tables, so hopefully some success on the 3 other ones there..
Re: Hash thread
So far no luck here on the last ones.
I will give up so and go over to phase 2 of the project.
Which is to use the cracked passwords in a dictionary attack against a bunch of bcrypted passes from the same entity (password reusal ftw).
I will give up so and go over to phase 2 of the project.
Which is to use the cracked passwords in a dictionary attack against a bunch of bcrypted passes from the same entity (password reusal ftw).
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
Re: Hash thread
hm, yeah, no luck here too yet....I have to add that I still had no time to run the 2 biggest table sets yet, too much work to do (and rcracki occupies a lot of CPU resources).
I will let you know once I had time for that, hopefully in the next couple of days...
I will let you know once I had time for that, hopefully in the next couple of days...
Re: Hash thread
Sweet!bad_brain wrote:hm, yeah, no luck here too yet....I have to add that I still had no time to run the 2 biggest table sets yet, too much work to do (and rcracki occupies a lot of CPU resources).
I will let you know once I had time for that, hopefully in the next couple of days...
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
Re: Hash thread
anyone can give this one a shot
according to hash ID:
Code: Select all
945d8fe37e54a08253f6b1a5805d8eeb15e7d4b4
Possible Hashs:
[+] SHA-1
[+] MySQL5 - SHA-1(SHA-1($pass))
There is an UNEQUAL amount of good and bad in most things, the trick is to work out the ratio and act accordingly. "The Jester"
Re: Hash thread
Cracking away with 2x R9 290 cards (usually 4 but 2 are not detected today for some reason. No time to fix).l0ngb1t wrote:anyone can give this one a shotaccording to hash ID:Code: Select all
945d8fe37e54a08253f6b1a5805d8eeb15e7d4b4
Possible Hashs:
[+] SHA-1
[+] MySQL5 - SHA-1(SHA-1($pass))
I'm going to my nephews birthday party now so I wont be able to give you any results until later tonight.
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
Re: Hash thread
wow that's nice, much appreciated...
There is an UNEQUAL amount of good and bad in most things, the trick is to work out the ratio and act accordingly. "The Jester"
Re: Hash thread
Home again.l0ngb1t wrote:wow that's nice, much appreciated...
Went through all of my wordlists, and so far no hit.
Doing length 1-8 (a-zA-Z0-9 + special chars) now SHA1.
I will try MySQL with the same set.
When this run is finished (MySQL as well) I wont go any further though.
EDIT: it might help me if you can tell me in what kind of environment you got this hash?
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
Re: Hash thread
SQLi
Mysql DB(obviously) with php...
again thank you very much for your effort.
Mysql DB(obviously) with php...
again thank you very much for your effort.
There is an UNEQUAL amount of good and bad in most things, the trick is to work out the ratio and act accordingly. "The Jester"
Re: Hash thread
Was the hash taken from the MySQL user table (mysql.users) or from a generic table like somedatabase.users?l0ngb1t wrote:SQLi
Mysql DB(obviously) with php...
again thank you very much for your effort.
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"