but against a site I am hosting, I thought I share this one because it shows how dumb people are and how superior they feel after googling for "how to file a DMCA complaint".
so here is the complaint:
well...little fella Justin got me on the wrong foot today:-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Chafer [mailto:linkremoval@linkaudit.co.uk]
Sent: Dienstag, 24. September 2013 13:11
To: Abuse Mailbox
Subject: DMCA TAKE DOWN NOTICE
Re: Copyright Claim
I work for the company: WOCCHAT.COM
Our site has been penalized by Google because of duplicated content and specifically from domains within your control, as result of this we have lost 80% of our traffic. I have opened a line of communication with Google's WebSpam team and am working to clear the penalty, but we need to get this content taken down ASAP!
HOW THIS AFFECTS YOU?
We have isolated the pages causing our penalty which we need to have removed and there are some from sites within your control.
Where Exactly Are These Links And Content Which Need Removing?
Specifically the following pages which are most likely operated by the same person and located here:
http://freechatonline.beep.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://xxx.xxx/contributions/chatroulet ... inent/7593" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
On the following IPs:
85.25.91.167
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law and is being hosted by 85-RIPE.
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
Kindest Regards
Justin Chafer
http://www.WOCCHAT.COM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
webmaster@usearchme.com
waiting for a reply from the server provider and best from law expert little Justin.First of all, this DMCA complaint is invalid because it does not provide the "original" URL to the supposedly duplicate content.
Second, google "penalized" NOW for the supposedly duplicate content after MORE THAN 3 YEARS after the queried post was made (2010/08/26)?
Don't get me wrong, of course I would take down the content on any hosted website if it violates copyrights, but this complaint seems to have a frivolous nature. I did a full text search on google and it came up with NO other result for the content than the supposedly "duplicate" one. How is this supposed to make sense?
