Ok....so this is not meant as bullshit, but trying to be philosphical about it. If in biology, cancer and the like can emulate the bodies own defences and steadily evolve, why not the same of viruses?
The perfect virus in my mind would cause maximum destruction to the computer, (just to make clear not social engineering my own lol)
What Im thinking is, if we could perhaps list any, every and all potential weaknesses and vulnerabilities of a virus, i.e. how does a firewall work, how does the AV work etc so as to identify and circumvent these defences.
You guys know me, not that uber l33t but heres my rough ideas:
the ideal virus would either be totally undetectable, or if it were to be detected would effectively self-destruct upon detection, a Kamikaze if you like.
It would be disguised as some necessary computer function so that in the event of suspicion any suspicion would be allayed.
It causes whatever the harmful effect is...but here is my point, even upon its "safe" removal, it would operate some final process so as to cause harm for revenge for its removal, or that it threatens/blackmails another process, so removing it will cause harm to some other key process.
As I said..purely theoretical
Perfect virus
Well...it would have to be detected by a human and added to a signature list before it would be detected =Pshamir wrote:I have created the perfect virus, its undetectable, I have tested it in Norton kaspersky and other antivirus online programs I tested almost on 10 programs it was undetectable, I coded this virus my self.
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
what the heck you talking about I tested it on a anitvirus program, not a human.neo130 wrote:Well...it would have to be detected by a human and added to a signature list before it would be detected =Pshamir wrote:I have created the perfect virus, its undetectable, I have tested it in Norton kaspersky and other antivirus online programs I tested almost on 10 programs it was undetectable, I coded this virus my self.
-
floodhound2
- ∑lectronic counselor
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: 03 Sep 2006, 16:00
- 17
- Location: 127.0.0.1
- Contact:
My idea of a perfect virus
Like a virus in real live I say to hell with stealth. Your body knows when it is under attack, so should computers AV. AV software should know the virus is onboard and thus begin the fight.
True a virus should spread attacking specific file/s, but caution should be considered. Ill explain:
Antivirus software will try to defend the spread and destruction, but ideally the virus would mutate and attack again i.e. becoming stronger by avoiding it own destruction.
If you were to code a virus and AV defeats it then the virus was not fit to strive in the digital realm – a failure.
If a particular virus is coded and is superior to the AV, thus completely destroying the computer. Then it too will be destroyed again a failure. This would mean that the virus should do destruction, but limited to a tolerable degree. You would have to code somewhere in the middle, because a virus can not live if there is no host.
Perhaps after several years of agonizing unnecessary clock cycles, spreading, and mutating the virus could celebrate by destroying the host computer? Particularly after the virus has infected several thousand/s of other host computers either directly or indirectly related to the original host…
…Then a super virus is born.
Like a virus in real live I say to hell with stealth. Your body knows when it is under attack, so should computers AV. AV software should know the virus is onboard and thus begin the fight.
True a virus should spread attacking specific file/s, but caution should be considered. Ill explain:
Antivirus software will try to defend the spread and destruction, but ideally the virus would mutate and attack again i.e. becoming stronger by avoiding it own destruction.
If you were to code a virus and AV defeats it then the virus was not fit to strive in the digital realm – a failure.
If a particular virus is coded and is superior to the AV, thus completely destroying the computer. Then it too will be destroyed again a failure. This would mean that the virus should do destruction, but limited to a tolerable degree. You would have to code somewhere in the middle, because a virus can not live if there is no host.
Perhaps after several years of agonizing unnecessary clock cycles, spreading, and mutating the virus could celebrate by destroying the host computer? Particularly after the virus has infected several thousand/s of other host computers either directly or indirectly related to the original host…
…Then a super virus is born.
₣£ΘΘĐĦΘŮŇĐ
what the heck you talking about I tested it on a anitvirus program, not a human.
Shamir, how do you think anti virus can detect virus?
It's detected by the ones developing it "humans", and then added to a list of signatures, if that signature is detected in a file then it's "detected"
well...at least thats the basic idea of it =/
"The best place to hide a tree, is in a forest"
how does your virus spread and wotshamir wrote:I have created the perfect virus, its undetectable, I have tested it in Norton kaspersky and other antivirus online programs I tested almost on 10 programs it was undetectable, I coded this virus my self.
language is it coded in ??
alsowot payload does it have
