whats every ones favorite linux distribution? and why?
for me i would say mandriva or fedora
Favorite linux distro
-
- suck-o-fied!
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 15 Jan 2006, 17:00
- 18
- Location: USA
-
- suck-o-fied!
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 15 Jan 2006, 17:00
- 18
- Location: USA
- w1tchdoctor
- suck-o-fied!
- Posts: 50
- Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 17:00
- 18
-
- suck-o-fied!
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 15 Jan 2006, 17:00
- 18
- Location: USA
think it would run good on a 700mh celeron with 128 mb or ram. normally wouldn't bother with such a slow machine but i think im going to put it in my carGODhack wrote:Puppy linux is the best for me.
Why?
1)Small,
2)easy to start from cd or usb or hdd or external hdd or...
3)fast - doesn't just work; it runs happily in most every computer!
Puppy Rocks!
MEPIS, Knoppix, Baltix(distro localized for my country) and Ubuntu also is good.
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11638
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
man, it would run REALLY good on a 700mHz box....my RedHat home server is just a P2 and it works fine. and such small distros are even optimized for really slow systems by using slim window managers like Fluxbox, so even the cheapest/slowest graphics card and CPU is enough.magiceiko wrote: think it would run good on a 700mh celeron with 128 mb or ram. normally wouldn't bother with such a slow machine but i think im going to put it in my car
-
- suck-o-fied!
- Posts: 99
- Joined: 15 Jan 2006, 17:00
- 18
- Location: USA
sweet ill have to make it a project on day and try it. so far debian has been the best but man i tryed installing the newest fedora and the newest mandriva and boy did it run slow.bad_brain wrote:man, it would run REALLY good on a 700mHz box....my RedHat home server is just a P2 and it works fine. and such small distros are even optimized for really slow systems by using slim window managers like Fluxbox, so even the cheapest/slowest graphics card and CPU is enough.magiceiko wrote: think it would run good on a 700mh celeron with 128 mb or ram. normally wouldn't bother with such a slow machine but i think im going to put it in my car
I would have to say that even though I am using Suse now, I liked ubuntu<---(spelling may be off) the best. I have tried many different distros and unbuntu is the one that has given me the least amount of trouble, and easiest set up. I like suse, but for some reason emacs won't work, but that could be a different thread all together.
- bad_brain
- Site Owner
- Posts: 11638
- Joined: 06 Apr 2005, 16:00
- 19
- Location: In your eye floaters.
- Contact:
yeah, I heard it already a couple of times that Ubuntu is a real nice distro, I hope I have some time in the near future to test it...
well, imo emacs is obsolete anyway, vi is a lot better, and it´s shell-only which is important when administrating remotely over SSH for example.
here are the basic vi commands:
when starting all you can do is to move the cursor, to edit the file you have to press i for insert.
when done with editing you have to press esc
by pressing : you start a command
:q quits vi
:w saves the file
you can also combine commands:
:wq saves the file and quits vi then
well, imo emacs is obsolete anyway, vi is a lot better, and it´s shell-only which is important when administrating remotely over SSH for example.
here are the basic vi commands:
when starting all you can do is to move the cursor, to edit the file you have to press i for insert.
when done with editing you have to press esc
by pressing : you start a command
:q quits vi
:w saves the file
you can also combine commands:
:wq saves the file and quits vi then