Wiki:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-7HroPe ... re=relatedThe HAARP project became the subject of controversy in the mid-1990s, following claims that the antennas could be used as a weapon. In August 2002, a critical mention of HAARP technology came from the State Duma (parliament) of Russia. The Duma issued a press release on the HAARP written by the international affairs and defense committees, signed by 90 deputies and presented to then President Vladimir Putin. The statement claimed:
The U.S. is creating new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the near-Earth medium with high-frequency radio waves ... The significance of this qualitative leap could be compared to the transition from cold steel to firearms, or from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons. This new type of weapons differs from previous types in that the near-Earth medium becomes at once an object of direct influence and its component.
It has the capability to control mindstate (moods) by sending frequencies similar to brain frequencies.
Cause massive earthquakes using low frequencies on the earth. (Scientifically Possible)
Totally alter weather. (could cause global catastrophe if used improperly)
Split the planet in two (Debatable by scientists)
Lift the ionosphere
Create artificial lighting 100 times more powerful than normal lightning.
Cause cancer (alter biological DNA) from radiation
Venezuelan president: US tectonic weapon caused Haiti quake
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/01/22/ve ... ident.html
President Chavez said the US was "playing God" by testing devices capable of creating eco-type catastrophes, the Spanish newspaper ABC quoted him as saying.
What do you think? Should we be scared?